Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the Clinician.

  • Ajaz Nabi Koul Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, SKIMS
Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility, WHO

Abstract

The clinicians are confronted with infections in their daily practice, and most of the times they rely on national or international data available to treat these infections. Sometimes it works but sometimes organisms do not respond to antimicrobials due to a variety of factors.

The data clinician applies is most of the time extrapolated from higher centers, centers of excellence in infectious diseases or he follows guidelines issued by various reputed organizations like WHO, CDC Atlanta, IDSA, NICE, etc.

Algorithms followed by the medical fraternity in managing infections have been changing with the advent of automation or computerization. Infectious disease diagnostics and management too has been changing fast since the advent of antibiotics. At the same time, these precious molecules are being used inadvertently due to the lack of isolation of organisms.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Surase PV, Nataraj G, Pattamadai K etal. An appropriately performed conventional blood culture can facilitate choice of therapy in resource constrained settings comparison with BACTEC 9050. J Postgrad Med.2016, 62:228-34.
2. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.26 ed supplement M100S.Wayne PA. Clinical and laboratory standards institute: 2016.pp1-82.
3. Bose S, Vishal G. Utility of BACTEC blood culture system versus conventional blood culture method for detection of bacteraemia. IJCMAS, 2018: 7(10); 1126-1131.
Published
2019-12-14
How to Cite
1.
Koul AN. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the Clinician. jms [Internet]. 2019Dec.14 [cited 2026Oct.4];22(2):1-. Available from: https://old.jmsskims.org/index.php/jms/article/view/499

Most read articles by the same author(s)